Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSBS
  • E-Submission

Plant Breed. Biotech. : Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Research Article

Growth and Physiological Responses of Quercus acutissima Seedling under Drought Stress

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 2017;5(4):363-370.
Published online: December 1, 2017

Department of Forest Genetic Resources, National Institute of Forest Science, Suwon 16631, Korea

*Corresponding author: Wi Young Lee, lwy20@korea.kr, Tel: +82-31-290-1000, Fax: +82-31-290-1008
• Received: November 10, 2017   • Revised: November 21, 2017   • Accepted: November 21, 2017

Copyright © 2017 The Korean Society of Breeding Science

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 15 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 7 Crossref
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Linking Leaf Angle to Physiological Responses for Drought Stress Detection: Case Study on Quercus acutissima Carruth. in Forest Nursery
    Ukhan Jeong, Dohee Kim, Sohyun Kim, Jiyeon Park, Seung Hyun Han, Eun Ju Cheong
    Forests.2026; 17(3): 348.     CrossRef
  • Seedling-stage drought responses of two endemic pear and oak species inform climate-adaptive management in Hyrcanian forests
    Yadollah Davoudi, Masoud Tabari, Seyed Ehsan Sadati, Martin Karl-Friedrich Bader
    Frontiers in Plant Science.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early Post-Germination Physiological Traits of Oak Species Under Various Environmental Conditions in Oak Forests
    Ljubica Mijatović, Branko Kanjevac, Janko Ljubičić, Ivona Kerkez Janković, Jovana Devetaković
    Forests.2025; 17(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Detection of responses to drought stress of dalbergia cochinchinensis seedlings using the physiological parameters and thermal imaging
    Mala Seng, Ukhan Jeong, Eun Ju Cheong
    Forest Science and Technology.2023; 19(2): 105.     CrossRef
  • Gas Exchanges and Accumulation of Osmolites in Declined Persian Oak Stands in Ilam Province (Case study: Gchan and Sheshdar Forest Area)
    afsaneh Tongo, Hamid Jalilvand, Mohamad Hosseininasr, Hamid Reza Naji
    Ecology of Iranian Forests.2022; 10(19): 22.     CrossRef
  • Leaf morphological and physiological variations in response to canopy dieback of Persian Oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.)
    Afsaneh Tongo, Hamid Jalilvand, Mohamad Hosseininasr, Hamid Reza Naji, P. Łakomy
    Forest Pathology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Genetic Diversity and Physiological Response to Drought Stress of Chamaecyparis obtuse from Six Geographical Locations
    Tae-Lim Kim, Kyungmi Lee, Wonwoo Cho, Danbe Park, Il Hwan Lee, Hyemin Lim
    Plant Breeding and Biotechnology.2021; 9(2): 112.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Growth and Physiological Responses of Quercus acutissima Seedling under Drought Stress
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2017;5(4):363-370.   Published online December 1, 2017
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Growth and Physiological Responses of Quercus acutissima Seedling under Drought Stress
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2017;5(4):363-370.   Published online December 1, 2017
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Growth and Physiological Responses of Quercus acutissima Seedling under Drought Stress
Image Image Image Image
Fig. 1 (A) Volumetric water content in the soil of the control- and drought-treated plant pots. Soil moisture was measured every 2 days for 30 days. The control plants were watered throughout the experiment. (B) Effect of drought on shoot height of Quercus acutissima S0536 and S012 family seedlings. Values are means ± SD (n = 19). No significant difference (t test) between the control family and the drought-treated family seedlings.
Fig. 2 Growth phenotypes of Quercus acutissima S0536 and S012 family seedlings subjected to drought (A, C). Control plants (left) and drought-treated plants (right) after 30 days. (B, D) Infrared thermal images. (A, B) Q. acutissima S0536 family seedlings. (C, D) Q. acutissima S012 family seedlings.
Fig. 3 Effects of chlorophyll a fluorescence in Quercus acutissima seedlings subjected to drought. (A) Fv/Fm after 30 days. (B) Fv/Fo after 30 days. (C) Fv/Fm after 30 days drought. (D) Fv/Fo after 30 days drought. Values are means ± SD of 10 independent measurements. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (t test; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001) between the control family and the drought-treated family seedlings.
Fig. 4 Effects of the carbohydrate and malondialdehyde in Quercus acutissima seedlings subjected to drought. (A) Glucose. (B) Fructose. (C) Sucrose. (D) Malondialdehyde (MDA) content. Values are means ± SD of three independent measurements. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) between the control family and the drought-treated family seedlings.
Growth and Physiological Responses of Quercus acutissima Seedling under Drought Stress

Growth of Qurercus acutissima after drought treatment.

Treatment Fresh weight (g/plant)z) Dry weight (g/plant)z)


Total Aerial part Root Total Aerial part Root S/R ratio
Control S0536 23.8±7.4 16.9±5.4 6.9±2.6 11.6±3.6 7.9±2.5 3.7±1.4 2.2±0.6
Drought S0536 21.8±2.9 15.8±2.6 5.9±1.2 10.5±2.6 8.0±1.6 3.1±0.6* 2.7±0.7*
Control S012 29.0±11.0 19.0±7.8 10.0±3.9 12.3±4.5 8.4±3.4 4.0±1.4 2.2±0.7
Drought S012 20.9±4.0** 14.1±3.3** 6.8±1.6** 10.4±2.4* 7.1±1.9 3.4±0.8* 2.2±0.5

z)Values are means ± SD (n = 20);

The asterisks indicate a significant difference (t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) between the control family and the drought-treated family seedlings.

Effects of drought-treated on photosynthetic pigments in Qurercus acutissima seedlings.

Treatment mg/g FWz) Chl a/bz) Chl/Carz)

Chl a Chl b Total Chl Carotenoids
Control S0536 5.99±0.55 3.26±0.22 9.25±0.76 0.62±0.09 1.84±0.07 15.12±1.95
Drought S0536 5.79±0.31 3.35±0.20 9.14±0.39 0.61±0.08 1.73±0.13 15.20±2.22
Control S012 5.50±0.32 3.17±0.18 8.67±0.50 0.48±0.01 1.73±0.01 17.96±1.12
Drought S012 6.53±0.43* 3.48±0.18 10.01±0.58* 0.79±0.08** 1.88±0.09* 12.75±1.21**

z)Values are means ± SD (n = 5);

The asterisks indicate a significant difference (t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) between the control family and the drought-treated family seedlings.

Table 1 Growth of Qurercus acutissima after drought treatment.

Values are means ± SD (n = 20);

The asterisks indicate a significant difference (t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) between the control family and the drought-treated family seedlings.

Table 2 Effects of drought-treated on photosynthetic pigments in Qurercus acutissima seedlings.

Values are means ± SD (n = 5);

The asterisks indicate a significant difference (t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) between the control family and the drought-treated family seedlings.