Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSBS
  • E-Submission

Plant Breed. Biotech. : Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Research Article

Identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races 4 and 9 by Molecular Marker-Based Approach

Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 2024;12:157-174.
Published online: October 28, 2024

1Department of Horticulture, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, Jeonnam 57922, Republic of Korea

2Interdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System, Sunchon National University, Jeonnam 57922, Republic of Korea

3Crop Breeding Division, Rural Development Administration, National Institute of Crop Science, Jeollabuk-do, 55365, Republic of Korea

4Graduate School of Life Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8577, Japan

*Corresponding to Jong-In Park TEL. +82-61-750-3241 E-mail. jipark@scnu.ac.kr
• Received: March 5, 2024   • Revised: October 4, 2024   • Accepted: October 4, 2024

Copyright © 2024 by the Korean Society of Breeding Science

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 20 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 3 Crossref
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Development of molecular markers for the detection of Paracidovorax citrulli strains causing bacterial fruit blotch in watermelon
    San Ha Choe, Nihar Sahu, Ijaz Yaseen, Se Hyeon Jeong, Gyoung Hee Kim, Jong In Park, Hoy Taek Kim
    Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology.2026; 48(3): 220.     CrossRef
  • An update to the molecular identification of Xanthomonas campestris disease causing pathogens in crucifers – A mini review
    Nihar Sahu, Masao Watanabe, Jong-In Park
    Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology.2026; 142: 103102.     CrossRef
  • Molecular marker development for specific amplification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris race 8 causing black rot disease in Brassica crops
    Sopheap Mao, Yeo-Hyeon Kim, Nihar Sahu, Su-Won Kim, Hoy-Taek Kim, Masao Watanabe, Jong-In Park
    Journal of General Plant Pathology.2025; 91(1): 31.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races 4 and 9 by Molecular Marker-Based Approach
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2024;12:157-174.   Published online October 28, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races 4 and 9 by Molecular Marker-Based Approach
Plant Breed. Biotech.. 2024;12:157-174.   Published online October 28, 2024
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races 4 and 9 by Molecular Marker-Based Approach
Image Image Image Image
Fig. 1 . a) Alignment of the whole genome sequences of Xcc races (1-9), two other Xc. pathovars (incanae and raphani), and another Xanthomonas species (X. campestris pv. vesicatoria); b) Line diagram representation of PCR amplification pattern with XccR9-2F2-2R1 primer; Dashed lines represent deletion region; Solid black bar represents similar genomic regions; Green arrow and blue arrows represent forward and reverse primers, respectively.
Fig. 2 Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products of Xcc race 4 and race 9 DNA using race a 9-specific primer, and Xcc race specific primer and specific primer sets of Xcc races 1-7 reported by previous studies. a) Xcc specific (Xcc-53, 930-bp); b) Xcc race 1-specific (Xcc-47R1, 1089-bp); c) Xcc race 2-specific (Xcc-R2-89-2, 929-bp); d) Xcc race 3-specific (XccR3-49, 867-bp); e) Xcc race 4-specific (Xcc2-46R4, 578-bp); f) Xcc race 5-specific (XccR5-89.2, 1515-bp); g) Xcc race 6-specific (XccR6-60, 693-bp); h) Xcc race 7-specific (Race 7-1F-1R, 600-bp); i) Xcc race 9-specific (XccR9-2F2-2R1, 830-bp) amplified from genomic DNA of Xcc races, Xc. pathovars and other plant pathogenic bacteria. Lane M: DNA ladder-100 bp; Lanes 1-9: Xcc races (1-9); Lane 10: X. campestris pv. incanae (WHRI-6377); Lane 11: X. campestris pv. raphani (WHRI-8305); Lane 12: X. campestris pv. zinniae (KACC17126); Lane 13: X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (KACC17821); Lane 14: X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (KACC11153); Lane 15: Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (ICMP13051); Lane 16: Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora (ICMP12464).
Fig. 3 Efficient detection of different rates of DNA concentrations by PCR amplification using XccR9-2F2-2R1 primer. a) Detection of genomic DNA of race 4; b) Detection of genomic DNA of race 9. Lane M: DNA ladder (100-bp); Lane 1: 30 ng μL-1; Lane 2: 3 ng μL-1; Lane 3: 0.3 ng μL-1; Lane 4: 0.03 ng μL-1; Lane 5: 0.003 ng μL-1.
Fig. 4 Bio-PCR assessment using race 9-specific primer (XccR9-2F2-2R1) to detect 27 samples from infected cabbage leaves after inoculation with strains of Xcc races 1-9. Lane M: DNA ladder (100-bp); Lane 1-3: race 1; Lane 4-6: race 2; Lane 7-9: race 3; Lane 10-12: race 4; Lane 13-15: race 5; Lane 16-18: race 6; Lane 19-21: race 7; Lane 22-24: race 8; Lane 25-27: race 9; +ve1: positive control of gDNA of race 4, +ve2: positive control of gDNA of race 9; -ve: negative control of distilled water.
Identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races 4 and 9 by Molecular Marker-Based Approach

List of bacterial strains used in this study.

SL. Bacterial Strains Races Host Country Collection Year References
1 X. campestris pv. campestris (HRIW-3811) 1 B. oleracea US 2017 Vicente et al. (2001)

2 X. campestris pv. campestris (HRIW-3849A) 2 B. oleracea var. botrytis US 2017

3 X. campestris pv. campestris (HRIW-5212) 3 B. oleracea var. gemmifera UK 2017

4 X. campestris pv. campestris (HRIW-1279A) 4 B. oleracea var. capitata UK 2017

5 X. campestris pv. campestris (HRIW-3880) 5 B. oleracea var. capitata Australia 2017

6 X. campestris pv. campestris (HRIW-6181) 6 B. rapa Portugal 2017

7 X. campestris pv. campestris (HRIW-8450A) 7 B. oleracea var. capitata UK 2017

8 X. campestris pv. campestris (MBG-145.3) 8 B. rapa Spain 2017 Lema et al. (2012)

9 X. campestris pv. campestris (NCPPB-1145) 9 - UK 2022 NCPPB

10 X. campestris pv. incanae (WHRI-6377) - Matthiola incana UK 2017 Vicente et al. (2001)

11 X. campestris pv. raphani (WHRI-8305) 2 B. rapa var. perviridis UK 2017

12 X. campestris pv. zinniae (KACC17126) - Zinnia elegans South Korea (Suwon) 2017 KACC

13 X. axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (KACC17821) - Anthurium andreanum South Korea (Yongin) 2017

14 X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (KACC11153) - - South Korea 2017

15 Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (ICMP13051) - B. oleracea var. capitata New Zealand 2016 ICMP

16 Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora (ICMP12464) - B. oleracea var. capitata New Zealand 2016
Table 1 List of bacterial strains used in this study.

Note: NCPPB-The National Collection of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, KACC- Korean Agriculture Culture Collection, Jeollabuk-do, Korea; ICMP-International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants, Auckland, New Zealand; HRI-W-Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne, UK